Proof

What two pilot cohorts measured.

Both sets of numbers below were measured by the districts themselves, on the assessment they already run, and every figure is shown with the instrument it came from.

Kindergarten

No students started the year on grade level. Two-thirds finished there.

Percentage of kindergarteners on or above grade level on the i-Ready Math Diagnostic. Non-pilot classrooms: 17% in fall, 25% in spring. Pilot classrooms: 0% in fall, 67% in spring.
8×

On the i-Ready Math Diagnostic, pilot classrooms moved from 0% of students on or above grade level in the fall to 67% in the spring. Comparison classrooms moved from 17% to 25%. That is a 67-point gain against an 8-point gain, from a starting point further back.

% of students on / above grade level · i-Ready Math Diagnostic

Middle School

The same pattern held where the starting data was harder.

Percentage of students proficient at Phillips Middle. 7th grade: 4% non-pilot, 54% pilot. 8th grade: 0% non-pilot, 29% pilot.
54% vs 4%

Over half of 7th graders in pilot classrooms reached proficiency, against 4% in non-pilot rooms in the same school. In 8th grade, pilot classrooms went from zero to 29% proficient - in a building where no non-pilot 8th grader tested proficient at all.

School-wide, students in the program made a median of 157% of typical annual growth, and 69% improved their placement level.

% proficient by grade · Phillips Middle · i-Ready · Edgecombe County, NC · 2024–2025

Honest Reading

How to read these numbers.

Both sets are pilot cohorts, measured by the districts themselves on assessments they already run. Neither is a controlled trial. Neither is a projection for your schools.

We publish them because they are the strongest evidence we have that changing teachers' mathematics changes what students can do - not because we are promising you the same figures. If anyone selling professional development quotes you a growth percentage for your district, ask them what it is measured on and who is standing behind it.

Teacher Buy-In

Fifteen out of fifteen teachers rated it five stars, on the district's own survey.

15/15★★★★★

The survey was anonymous and the district ran it, not us. Teachers had no reason to be generous and every opportunity not to be. Three of them wrote the following.

Kevin Moore holds a rekenrek while facilitating, beside a slide reading "A student who produces reasoning can check it, defend it, and revise it. A student who receives answers can only repeat them."
Kevin Moore facilitating for a room of seated teachers, with whiteboards behind him showing worked expressions headed Distribution and Association.
Kevin Moore working an expression through at a whiteboard headed Association, teachers watching from the room.
Challenged me to unlearn math so I could relearn it.
Participating teacher
Got my staff into the work and language of math.
Principal · Summer 2026 cohort
There is more than one way to do math. The process is more important than the answer.
Participating teacher

Anonymous post-survey · administered by the district · Summer 2026 immersive

The fastest way to judge this is to do the mathematics yourself.

A 45-minute conversation first · the half-day is priced at cost